- iRacing.com Announces iRacing 2.013,023
- iRacing.com to create virtual McLaren MP4-12C GT39,258
- Scanning What’s in Store for iRacing with Tony Gardner7,385
- Dave Kaemmer Comes Clean on Dirt7,371
- The iRacing.com Protest System – May, 20126,643
- Improving the Sound of iRacing5,620
- iRacing 2.0 Debuts in 2011 Season 34,927
- Preview Shots of HPD ARX-01C, Ford GT & Suzuka4,889
- Two New Cars and Two New Tracks Coming to iRacing Soon4,789
- iRacing.com to Build Digital Honda for New Super GT Series4,458
- iRacing.com Announces iRacing 2.0 41
- Dave Kaemmer Comes Clean on Dirt 32
- The iRacing.com Protest System - May, 2012 30
- iRacing's Corvette: Good Enough is Not Good Enough 23
- No Obstacles Here 18
- iRacing.com to Build Digital Honda for New Super GT Series 11
- BRDC International Trophy Silverstone 10
- An Interesting Year, Part I 8
- iRacing.com to create virtual McLaren MP4-12C GT3 8
- Putting the “Personal” in PC Gaming Computers 7
- iRacing.com2335
- NASCAR 1891
- Motorcycles 1843
- Formula Cars 1705
- WRC 1427
- IndyCar 1296
- Touring Cars 873
- Sports Cars 307
- Other Racing 355
BBC defends shared F1 coverage move
December 21st, 2011
BBC director general Mark Thompson has defended the decision for Formula 1 television coverage to be shared with Sky from next year – claiming any other deal would have been worse for fans.
In a transcript that has just been published from a recent hearing in front of MPs at the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee, Thompson said that the share deal is better for fans than if F1 coverage had gone to another British broadcaster.
He claimed that there was a real danger of F1 eventually disappearing totally to a pay channel – whereas now fans will at least have free access to half the races.
“We know that Formula 1 has only fairly recently come back to the BBC; it has been very popular on the BBC,” said Thompson.
“Secondly, we know that Formula 1 fans ideally do not want Formula 1 to be interrupted by advertising, because of the character of the sport. Nor, of course-for the subset of Formula 1 fans who do not have Sky subscriptions-would they, ideally, like Formula 1 to go entirely behind a pay wall.
“I believe that the arrangements that we have reached offer very good value to the licence payer, and the experience of Formula 1 on the BBC will still be very rich. The first grand prix next season, when this new arrangement starts – the Australian Grand Prix – will be live on Sky in the very early hours of the morning. There will be a 75-minute highlights package in peak time on the BBC, which we would expect to reach many more people than the live coverage.”
He added: “Talking about changing the arrangements in the existing contract and the extension of that contract, all I would say – and I have of course heard the arguments that perhaps this could have been picked up by another free-to-air broadcaster – is that what we have done has guaranteed that a very large amount of Formula 1 will still to be free-to-air to the British public for many years to come. Had we simply stopped the contract and decided to walk away from Formula 1 after that, there was a real danger that all of Formula 1 would have gone behind a pay wall.”
Thompson said the deal with Sky will save the BBC more than £150 million over the duration of the contract – and made it clear that there was no consideration given to offering the F1 contract to another British free-to-air broadcaster.
“We were quite clear that, to get the economics to work for us, it was going to have to be a pay partner, and this was the only pay partner, credibly, whom we thought we could involve in it – indeed, a pay partner who had expressed interest in this very topic of conversation previously,” he said. “It was an example of a free-to-air pay partnership, which is not by any means unknown in the market.
When pushed further on why there was not even a single conversation with Channel 4, Thompson said: “It seems to me that it was not required of us, and given that, in a sense, what we were trying to achieve on behalf of the licence fee payer was a significant saving, actually keeping the confidentiality of the process until it was clear whether the thing was viable and whether all parties to it – including, of course, the rights-holder – were happy, militated in terms of doing it the way we did it.”




David Phillips
Chris Hall
Jameson Spies
Jason Lofing
Tim Terry
David Allen
Allen Krier