- iRacing.com Announces iRacing 2.020,265
- Dave Kaemmer Comes Clean on Dirt13,155
- iRacing.com to create virtual McLaren MP4-12C GT312,084
- Release Notes for 2012 Season 311,422
- Scanning What’s in Store for iRacing with Tony Gardner10,576
- The iRacing.com Protest System – May, 201210,370
- Building the iRacing System 1019,063
- Improving the Sound of iRacing7,634
- iRacing.com to Build Digital Honda for New Super GT Series7,412
- Two New Cars and Two New Tracks Coming to iRacing Soon6,769
- Dave Kaemmer Comes Clean on Dirt 44
- iRacing.com Announces iRacing 2.0 41
- The iRacing.com Protest System - May, 2012 33
- Huttu's Online Racing Grand Slam 26
- iRacing Announces Added Features, Lower Prices 24
- Scanning What’s in Store for iRacing with Tony Gardner 22
- iRacing Simulation Gives NASCAR Hall of Fame Guests Authentic Driving Experience 17
- The Customer is (Nearly) Always Right 15
- V-Sunk 15
- V8 Supercars to Sanction iRacing.com Series 15
-
iRacing.com
3083
-
Motorcycles
2473
-
NASCAR
2302
-
Formula Cars
2090
-
WRC
1832
-
IndyCar
1605
-
Touring Cars
1215
-
Other Racing
501
-
Sports Cars
310
Fixed Setups and iRacing: Empowering Your Inner Driver or Frustrating Your Inner Engineer?
by John Bodin on August 4th, 2010
When iRacing unveiled the 2010 Season 3 schedule they also announced the addition of two new fixed-setup series — both of these fixed-setup series will be B-Class series, featuring the C6.R Corvette on the road course side, and the Impala SS Class B on the oval side. These new fixed-setup series will run in addition to the existing open (adjustable) setup iRacing GT Championship and NASCAR iRacing Class B series on the same schedule but with race distances set at 50% of the adjustable setup events.

Fixed setups are nothing new to iRacing . . .
Fixed setups are nothing new to iRacing — every member initially stated out in fixed-setup series: The Rookie Legends on the oval side is a fixed-setup series, and the Rookie Solstice on the road racing side is also a fixed-setup series. Moving up the iRacing license ranks, the Volkswagen Jetta TDI Cup is a fixed-setup road racing series that runs at the D-Class, and while the Skip Barber Race Series doesn’t qualify as a true “fixed-setup” series, the Formula Skip Barber 2000 cars features a very limited number of setup adjustments, including tire pressure, fuel load, front ride height (spring perch settings), brake bias, and rear anti-roll bar setting, which positions it very close to the fixed-setup end of the spectrum.
Given all of this, you would think that the addition of two fixed-setup series at the B-Class level wouldn’t be a big deal — in fact, on the oval side, the addition of the fixed-setup Class-B series means there will be more opportunities to race in that car. These new fixed-setup series offer a different set of challenges than the open (adjustable) setup series, and should encourage more people to try racing in these series thanks to the level playing field provided by the option of racing in a fixed-setup series without having to worry about trying to become a race engineer on top of having to learn the cars and tracks.
Still, despite all this, I’ve seen a lot of offhand comments in the iRacing member forums indicating that fixed setup racing is going to take away a significant aspect of realism here at iRacing . . . but I’m not so sure.
I think the issue of how you as an individual driver is going to be impacted by the prospect of being “forced” to race in a fixed-setup series has a lot to do with whether you primarily think of yourself as a driver or as a race engineer.
Consider what it means being a race driver in the real world, especially among the professional ranks — I’m sure a lot of drivers often find themselves “at the mercy” of their race engineer because they provide feedback to the engineer, the engineer dials-in settings, the mechanics do their thing, and then the driver has to go out and try to drive whatever concoction the engineer and mechanics have thrown together.

There's no blaming your inner engineer when this happens with a fixed setup!
In many ways, this is one crucial area where sim racing differs from how it really is in the real world — a lot of good drivers understand what works, but even the best drivers today typically aren’t the ones turning the wrenches, or analyzing the telemetry data. It takes a good driver/engineer combo to establish the necessary rapport required to give and receive good feedback in order to produce positive results, and it sometimes takes a team of mechanics a significant amount of time to make the necessary changes (stuff that we accomplish with a few simple clicks in a menu).
Just consider that the fixed setup races are roughly equal to moving to a new team in the real-world, with a race engineer with whom you’re not familiar. Fixed setups are kind of like if you were picked-up by a big team to fill-in for an injured driver — the team would give you a car that was setup to perform in a relatively predictable manner; it would have a decent setup, but it wouldn’t be dialed-in and fully-tweaked to match your preferences and your driving style.
When it comes down to those fully dialed-in, “personalized” setups in the real world, they only come from long-term relationships between drivers and engineers who work well and closely over time. Drivers who are given setups that “should” work and then asked to jump in a car and go fast and compete is probably closer to the norm in the real world, and we sim racers are quite spoiled by being able to be our own drivers, race engineers and mechanics — this just doesn’t happen all that much in the real world, where things that we would consider “fixed setups” are much closer to the norm.
With all of this in mind, the prospect of fixed-setup racing really only impacts our “inner engineer” — the driver within still has a car to master, and a track to tame. Keep that in mind — and keep an open mind — and fixed setup racing begins to seem a lot less “unrealistic.”









David Phillips
Chris Hall
Jameson Spies
Jason Lofing
David Ifeguni
Katier Scott
Dylan Sharman
Nathan Aljoe
Austin Hartenfels
Jordan Hightower
Scott Kelly
Kenneth O'Keefe
Chris Owens
George Wood
Mark A Warmington
August 5th, 2010 at 9:23 amGood article and an interesting viewpoint on the topic that became quite emotive on the forums.
For many, the issue of realism never entered the debate. Instead – the emotive point for many was that the option to satisfy the inner engineer was being removed. The scenario we have now (fixed and open) resolved the issue as those wish to focus just on driving the car can do so and those who wish to develop their own understanding can do so.
It’s all about what you want to get from iRacing: some just want to race and some want to continue the development of their skill-set with what is arguably the finest racing simulation available to the general public.
Ryan
August 5th, 2010 at 3:47 pmI like fixed setup racing and I’m anxious to raise my license level high enough to be able to run the oval series.
The one “catch” to just “being the driver” is the fact that in the real world that engineer is still there to listen to our feedback and make changes accordingly. We don’t really get to give iRacing feedback to the fixed setups to make any changes let alone dial it in.
I can understand why people are frustrated, but their complaints don’t hold water as long as it doesn’t hurt participation in the open setup version of the series. In my opinion I suspect it will help. You run the fixed setup one day and get comfortable with the car and then you’re more apt to try the open setup on the same track even if you only run the fixed setup.
Alexandre
August 5th, 2010 at 9:27 pm“…should encourage more people to try racing in these
series thanks to the level playing field provided by the
option of racing in a fixed-setup series…”
some people will never understand that fixed setups
do not level any playing field, much less in the case of
the corvette, where you see people lapping 1.55s at
sebring while others are lapping 2.01s.
people who lap 1.55s in the fixed series would be the
fastest ones with open sets anyway. people who lap
2.01s would have difficulty in any corvette series, no
matter what restriction you made to it.
shorter distances are another matter and that, maybe
is what these people are looking for in the fixed series.
i don’t have an opinion on the oval side of things.
Jay
August 10th, 2010 at 7:50 pmWell said Alexandre, fixed setups certainly save time, I’ll concede that, but they definitely don’t do anything to level the playing field. Especially when you consider that a lot of the fast drivers share their setups with the public anyway. So if there are fast/good setups out there, what’s the need for fixed series when you already have the best setups available to you? In that sense what does it really accomplish for you?
Secondly what does level the playing field are the splits. So if you don’t have a setup equal to the fastest guys you still have the opportunity to be competitive. If you’re not being placed in the top split because of your setup, guess what, that’s simply the nature of racing.
Finally the fixed setup, for the Corvette, has taken away from the open series. Like I’ve said before it’s nice to have your options, but not at the expense of something else. There just aren’t enough active members to have this many series going right now.
robert fuller
September 15th, 2012 at 3:57 pmI felt bad not having my own setup. this will help me